Movies shot in widescreen feel more cinematic. The aspect ratio seems has the power to immediately make scenes feel more epic and intense. But why? According to one theory, we were taught to feel this way. Widescreen movies feel more cinematic thanks to human convention. In fact, we have to be sold on the idea of widescreen films. A hundred years ago, films shown in theaters were played in a 4 by 3 ratio rather than the widescreen ratio we are now used to.
The reason is that this was the actual shape of the film strip used to capture these images. For 50 years, this was the ratio that all films used, partly because it just looked good. Many directors felt it was great for close-ups. The main reason, however, was that it was hard to change.
You would have to change all the film, the camera, the lenses and the projectors, industry-wide. Plus, cinema attendance was high — much higher than today — so there was no motivation to change things. But that changed in the late s.
A special lens inside the projector squeezes the image to make it look normal. Super gauges - The entire negative, including the area traditionally reserved for the soundtrack, was shot with a wider door. For example, the aspect ratio of the Super 35 can be set to virtually any projection standard. Large gauge - 70 mm film frame is not only twice as wide as the standard frame but also larger. Multiple lens cameras - The Cinerama system originally involved shooting with the three-lens camera, and projecting the three resulting films on a curved screen with three synchronized projectors, resulting in an ultrawide aspect ratio of 2.
Which one is the best camera for YouTube in ? This post introduces the top 5 cameras and you can choose the best one for yourself after comparison. Widescreen was first used in "Corbet"-Battle of Fitzsimmons in This is not only the longest film released in minutes to date but also the first widescreen film to be taken with a 63mm Eastman film with five perforations per frame.
Then it was first widely used in some short and news and feature films in the late s. In both of these cases, you lose a significant part of the film frame, and in the case of centre cut-out you may lose some of the action too. It is commonly held by broadcasters that the image should fill the entire screen, because they believe - though there is little, if any, research to back this up - that viewers dislike the black bands that result from letterboxing.
The fact is that on a TV screen, you will see the full frame of a widescreen movie when it is letterboxed, albeit wide and thin top-to-bottom as it actually is; while if it is cropped to fill the screen, a significant part of the image will be lost. Thus it may be suggested that letterboxing is the 'best' way of presenting a widescreen movie for viewers - at least you see what the director intended. Now, however, the situation is becoming much more complex, with the advent of digital 'standard definition' and 'high definition' television, and widescreen TV sets with an aspect ratio of We will assume the UK in this discussion unless otherwise indicated: the situation here is more complex, as there are both and broadcasts in SD and, we shall see, !
The SD aspect ratio can be as with analogue broadcasts, or However, the image as actually broadcast on the UK's digital television services digital satellite - Sky; Digital Terrestrial Television - Freeview; or digital cable contains the same amount of data as a standard image: the image is essentially 'squashed' into the width and expanded again on reception. Alex US English. David US English. Mark US English. Daniel British. Libby British. Mia British. Karen Australian.
Hayley Australian. Natasha Australian. Veena Indian. Priya Indian. Neerja Indian.
0コメント